Tonight I watched I Daniel Blake, I know some will say you cannot have watched it unless you saw it at the pictures, but I did only it had foreign subtitles but it was in English language. from the film I thought there was a couple of inaccuracies one was that if you apply for any other benefit they close your claim on ESA or tell you you cannot because you have an open claim.
To claim any other benefit you must close the claim for ESA and that is the mandatory reconsideration you requested, you need money or funds to see you by something like PIP/DLA or savings to see you through, because they can take as long as they like to make the decision.
If someone wants this could make a very hard hitting TV series not necessarily Daniel Blake but along the lines of I Daniel Blake, The John Smith story basing say two or three two hour episodes on one story. This is something the main 4 channels possibly wouldn't touch with a barge pole it would be up to say Netflix or Amazon to do it, and say they just did it for the UK subscribers it could really rock any government in power if they did. It could really shame MP's that voted to cut the WRAG component from ESA, while in 2017 they are going to receive a £1000 rise.
They could end each episode with
"I AM NOT A CLIENT, A CUSTOMER, NOR A SERVICE USER, I AM NOT A SHIRKER, A SCROUNGER, A BEGGAR NOR A THIEF, I AM NOT A NATIONAL INSURANCE NUMBER, NOR A BLIP ON A SCREEN. I PAID MY DUES, NEVER A PENNY SHORT, AND PROUD TO DO SO. MY NAME IS __________________ , I AM A MAN/WOMAN, NOT A DOG, AS SUCH, I DEMAND MY RIGHTS. I DEMAND YOU TREAT ME WITH RESPECT. I _________________
, AM A CITIZEN, NOTHING MORE, NOTHING LESS."
Katie read that out at Daniel Blake's funeral, after he died. I am sure they would be swamped with story's from people who may want to remain anonymous but get their story out. Nothing would give me greater pleasure than seeing both Labour and Conservatives been humiliated by this on streaming services, or any channel willing to make a series on this subject.
I have things I would like to humiliate the government with! Why do you think they say that HP's will never have to attend tribunals? Because no matter who you send the request too it will never be passed on to the HP telling them they have to attend, same with decision makers they think they are safe from having to turn up! The best you get if a tribunal is adjourned to allow them to attend is a solicitor turning up and the best they can do is give an opinion of an opinion.
I have a list of forms that should be requested as soon as you get home or the HP has gone from your home, or you get the result of a paper assessment and they are
To claim any other benefit you must close the claim for ESA and that is the mandatory reconsideration you requested, you need money or funds to see you by something like PIP/DLA or savings to see you through, because they can take as long as they like to make the decision.
If someone wants this could make a very hard hitting TV series not necessarily Daniel Blake but along the lines of I Daniel Blake, The John Smith story basing say two or three two hour episodes on one story. This is something the main 4 channels possibly wouldn't touch with a barge pole it would be up to say Netflix or Amazon to do it, and say they just did it for the UK subscribers it could really rock any government in power if they did. It could really shame MP's that voted to cut the WRAG component from ESA, while in 2017 they are going to receive a £1000 rise.
They could end each episode with
"I AM NOT A CLIENT, A CUSTOMER, NOR A SERVICE USER, I AM NOT A SHIRKER, A SCROUNGER, A BEGGAR NOR A THIEF, I AM NOT A NATIONAL INSURANCE NUMBER, NOR A BLIP ON A SCREEN. I PAID MY DUES, NEVER A PENNY SHORT, AND PROUD TO DO SO. MY NAME IS __________________ , I AM A MAN/WOMAN, NOT A DOG, AS SUCH, I DEMAND MY RIGHTS. I DEMAND YOU TREAT ME WITH RESPECT. I _________________
, AM A CITIZEN, NOTHING MORE, NOTHING LESS."
Katie read that out at Daniel Blake's funeral, after he died. I am sure they would be swamped with story's from people who may want to remain anonymous but get their story out. Nothing would give me greater pleasure than seeing both Labour and Conservatives been humiliated by this on streaming services, or any channel willing to make a series on this subject.
I have things I would like to humiliate the government with! Why do you think they say that HP's will never have to attend tribunals? Because no matter who you send the request too it will never be passed on to the HP telling them they have to attend, same with decision makers they think they are safe from having to turn up! The best you get if a tribunal is adjourned to allow them to attend is a solicitor turning up and the best they can do is give an opinion of an opinion.
I have a list of forms that should be requested as soon as you get home or the HP has gone from your home, or you get the result of a paper assessment and they are
ESA
- ESA50 (unless you copied the completed one to file)ESA85 (report)ESA85(S)ESA113LT54/ESA65All the information used by the HP including web addresses of sites they used to search for informationAll the information used by the decision maker plus web addresses and the name(s) plus qualifications of anyone they contacted to ask for further informationThe medical qualifications of the decision maker who made the decision
PIP
PIP01PIP02PIP04PIP07All the information the HP used plus web addresses of sites they looked up information onAll the information the decision maker used plus web addresses of sites they used to gather information plus the name and medical qualifications of any person they contacted for information on the reportIf you get bad news, fail the assessment, you should ask for a reconsideration, they can take their time so don't waste yours but do withhold your number if you call them 141 from a BT line or hide caller ID on a mobile. you won't get paid while they reconsider but you may get hardship payments for ESA.If you get to a tribunal without doing a Daniel Blake (dying) then you should also have asked that the HP and both decision makers are there to answer question, you aren't going to ask them just about the report but about everything you can get away with!you are going to ask them- How long they have work for the DWP or assessment company?
- If they work part time or full time?
- Ask the HP their full name as given on the GMC/NMC/HCP website and their number
- Ask their fields of speciality? if asked by the panel or person to elaborate, say if this was a court and you were giving evidence what would say you have expert medical knowledge in?
- How many books/pages/paragraphs or sentences they have read on your medical conditions?
- Could you name at least one of them?
- Are they available for sale to the general public?
- Did you contact anyone for advice, either before or after the assessment? What are their medical qualifications?
- (DM) Did you contact anyone for further information if so what is their field of expertise?
- (DM) What is your specialist field of medical knowledge? Ask them to explain some medical terms to you have and the answers too.
- Can you point out what is FACT and what is opinion in the report?
But you won't have to go through that the worst they will try is to send a solicitor to answer the questions and throw you off with legal jargon, do not allow them to stand as a representative of either the HP or decision makers. You become the Daniel Blake, direct questions to the medical person on the panel if they say they will answer any questions you have, make them wet themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment